chore(config): add PRD.md and .claude/ project config to repository

- PRD.md: Product Requirements Document (single source of truth for all requirements)
- .claude/settings.local.json: Claude Code agent permission config
- .claude/commands/: project-specific slash commands
- .claude/skills/: project-specific skill definitions

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
SentryAgent.ai Developer
2026-04-07 08:43:04 +00:00
parent 4e3b989629
commit dceefebf18
13 changed files with 2854 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
---
name: "Continue"
description: Capture a full project status snapshot so the next session can continue seamlessly from where this one left off
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, session, continuity, memory, snapshot]
---
Capture the full current project status and store it in persistent memory so the next session can pick up exactly where this one left off — no context lost, no recap needed.
**Input**: No arguments required. Run `/continue` at any point when ending a session.
---
**Steps**
1. **Capture git state**
Run the following in parallel:
```bash
git status
git branch --show-current
git log --oneline -10
git diff --stat HEAD
git stash list
```
Record:
- Current branch name
- Uncommitted files (staged and unstaged), with change type (M/A/D/?)
- Last 10 commit messages (for continuity context)
- Summary of diff stats if uncommitted changes exist
- Any stashed work
2. **Capture OpenSpec change state**
Run `openspec list --json` to get all active changes.
For each active (non-archived) change, run:
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
For each active change, also read its `tasks.md` to count:
- Total tasks
- Completed tasks (`- [x]`)
- Pending tasks (`- [ ]`)
- The text of the next pending task (to know what's up next)
Record per change:
- Change name
- Schema
- Artifact completion (which are done, which are pending)
- Task progress (X of Y complete)
- Next pending task description
- Any delta specs present (`openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`)
**If no active changes:** Note that there are no active OpenSpec changes.
3. **Capture in-session conversation context**
Summarize what was worked on in this session based on the conversation:
- What was the user trying to accomplish?
- What was completed?
- What was left in-progress or blocked?
- Any key decisions made during this session
- Any open questions or next actions the user mentioned
Keep this factual and brief — 38 bullet points.
4. **Capture memory file state**
Read `MEMORY.md` from the project memory directory:
`~/.claude/projects/-home-ubuntu-vj-ai-agents-dev-sentryagent-idp/memory/MEMORY.md`
Note the existing memory entries to avoid duplication in the next step.
5. **Write session snapshot to memory**
Write a `session_snapshot.md` file to the project memory directory:
`~/.claude/projects/-home-ubuntu-vj-ai-agents-dev-sentryagent-idp/memory/session_snapshot.md`
Use this structure:
```markdown
---
name: Session Snapshot
description: Last session status — git state, OpenSpec progress, and conversation context for seamless resumption
type: project
---
**Session ended:** YYYY-MM-DD (today's date)
## Git State
**Branch:** <branch-name>
**Uncommitted changes:** <count> files (<list filenames>)
**Last commit:** <hash> <message>
<If uncommitted changes exist, list them with their status>
<If stashes exist, list them>
## OpenSpec Changes
<For each active change:>
### <change-name>
- **Schema:** <schema-name>
- **Artifacts:** <done-count>/<total-count> complete (<list incomplete artifact names>)
- **Tasks:** <done-count>/<total-count> complete
- **Next task:** <text of next pending task>
- **Delta specs:** <present / none>
<If no active changes:> No active OpenSpec changes.
## Session Work
<Bullet list of what was worked on, completed, and left in-progress>
## Next Actions
<Bullet list of concrete next steps to resume — derived from pending tasks, blockers, open questions>
```
**IMPORTANT:** Always overwrite `session_snapshot.md` — this is a rolling snapshot, not a log. Only the most recent session state matters.
6. **Update MEMORY.md index**
Read the current `MEMORY.md`. If `session_snapshot.md` is not already listed, add it:
```
- [Session Snapshot](session_snapshot.md) — Last session: YYYY-MM-DD | branch: <name> | <N> active changes | <N> uncommitted files
```
If it is already listed, update the line to reflect today's date and current state.
Write the updated `MEMORY.md`.
7. **Display break summary**
Show a clean summary so the user knows the snapshot is complete:
```
## Snapshot Saved — See You Next Session
**Branch:** <branch-name>
**Uncommitted files:** <count> (<filenames>)
**Active changes:** <count>
<For each active change:>
- <change-name>: <done>/<total> tasks complete — Next: "<next task text>"
**Session context saved to memory.**
To resume: start a new session and run /continue — Claude will load the snapshot and pick up where you left off.
```
---
**Output On Success (with active changes)**
```
## Snapshot Saved — See You Next Session
**Branch:** develop
**Uncommitted files:** 3 (src/auth/token.ts, tests/auth.test.ts, README.md)
**Active changes:** 1
- add-agent-auth: 4/7 tasks complete — Next: "Implement JWT signing with RS256"
**Session context saved to memory.**
To resume: start a new session and run /continue — Claude will load the snapshot and pick up where you left off.
```
**Output On Success (clean state)**
```
## Snapshot Saved — See You Next Session
**Branch:** main
**Uncommitted files:** 0
**Active changes:** 0
**Session context saved to memory.**
To resume: start a new session and run /continue — Claude will load the snapshot and pick up where you left off.
```
---
**Guardrails**
- Always overwrite `session_snapshot.md` — do NOT append or create versioned copies
- Never include secrets, tokens, or credentials in the snapshot
- If `openspec list` fails (CLI not available), note that and skip OpenSpec capture gracefully
- If git is unavailable, note that and skip git capture gracefully
- Keep the session context summary factual — no speculation about future plans beyond what the user explicitly stated
- The MEMORY.md index line for `session_snapshot.md` must stay under 150 characters
- This command does NOT commit code, push branches, or modify any project files — it only writes to the memory directory

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
---
name: "OpenSpec Project Status"
description: Show a human-readable summary of all OpenSpec changes — active, archived, artifact completion, and task progress
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, status, openspec, reporting]
---
Show the full OpenSpec project status in a clear, human-readable format. No raw JSON — just a clean picture of where the project stands.
**Input**: No arguments required. Run `/openspec-project-status` at any time.
---
**Steps**
1. **Get all changes**
Run:
```bash
openspec list --json
```
Separate results into:
- **Active changes** (not in `archive/`)
- **Archived changes** (in `archive/`)
If the command fails or no changes exist, display a friendly empty state (see Output section).
2. **For each active change, gather full status**
Run in parallel for all active changes:
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Also read each change's `tasks.md` to extract:
- Total task count
- Completed tasks (`- [x]`)
- Pending tasks (`- [ ]`)
- Text of the **next pending task** (first `- [ ]` item)
Also check for delta specs at `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/` — note if present.
3. **For archived changes**
List them by archive date (newest first). No need to read full status — just show name and archive date from the folder name (`YYYY-MM-DD-<name>`).
4. **Render the human-readable status report**
Use the output format defined below.
---
**Output Format**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
### Active Changes (<count>)
────────────────────────────────────────
<change-name>
────────────────────────────────────────
Schema: <schema-name>
Phase: <inferred from artifact state: Proposing | Designing | Ready to Implement | In Progress | Complete>
Artifacts
✓ proposal done
✓ design done
◌ tasks pending
Tasks <done>/<total> complete
████████░░░░░░░░ 50%
Next: "<text of next pending task>"
Delta Specs <present / none>
────────────────────────────────────────
<Repeat for each active change>
---
### Archived Changes (<count>)
2026-03-20 add-initial-auth
2026-03-15 setup-ci-pipeline
2026-03-10 scaffold-project
---
### Summary
Active changes: <N>
Ready to apply: <N> (all artifacts done, tasks pending)
In progress: <N> (tasks partially complete)
Complete: <N> (all tasks done, not yet archived)
Archived: <N>
```
**Phase inference rules** (from artifact + task state):
- `Proposing` — proposal artifact is not done
- `Designing` — proposal done, design not done
- `Speccing` — design done, tasks artifact not done
- `Ready to Implement` — all artifacts done, 0 tasks complete
- `In Progress` — all artifacts done, some tasks complete but not all
- `Complete` — all artifacts done, all tasks complete (not yet archived)
**Progress bar rules:**
- 16 chars wide: `` per completed segment, `` for remaining
- Show percentage after bar
- If 0 tasks: show `No tasks yet`
- If all tasks done: show `████████████████ 100% All done!`
---
**Output: No active changes**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
### Active Changes (0)
No active changes. Start one with /opsx:propose
---
### Archived Changes (<count>)
2026-03-20 add-initial-auth
...
---
### Summary
Active changes: 0
Archived: <N>
```
**Output: OpenSpec CLI unavailable**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
OpenSpec CLI not available. Cannot read change data.
Make sure `openspec` is installed and accessible in your PATH.
```
---
**Guardrails**
- Never show raw JSON — always translate to human-readable output
- Never guess artifact or task state — always read from actual files and CLI output
- If a `tasks.md` file does not exist for a change, show `No tasks file` instead of 0/0
- Archived changes are display-only — never modify them
- Phase labels must be inferred strictly from actual artifact + task state, not assumed
- If `openspec status` fails for a specific change, show that change with `Status unavailable` and continue

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
---
name: "OPSX: Apply"
description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, artifacts, experimental]
---
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
**Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., `/opsx:apply add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
**Steps**
1. **Select the change**
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:apply <other>`).
2. **Check status to understand the schema**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Parse the JSON to understand:
- `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
3. **Get apply instructions**
```bash
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
```
This returns:
- Context file paths (varies by schema)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
**Handle states:**
- If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using `/opsx:continue`
- If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
- Otherwise: proceed to implementation
4. **Read context files**
Read the files listed in `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
The files depend on the schema being used:
- **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
5. **Show current progress**
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
- Continue to next task
**Pause if:**
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
7. **On completion or pause, show status**
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
**Output During Implementation**
```
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
```
**Output On Completion**
```
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.
```
**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
```
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
```
**Guardrails**
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
**Fluid Workflow Integration**
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
---
name: "OPSX: Archive"
description: Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, archive, experimental]
---
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
**Input**: Optionally specify a change name after `/opsx:archive` (e.g., `/opsx:archive add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
**Steps**
1. **If no change name provided, prompt for selection**
Run `openspec list --json` to get available changes. Use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select.
Show only active changes (not already archived).
Include the schema used for each change if available.
**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
2. **Check artifact completion status**
Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
Parse the JSON to understand:
- `schemaName`: The workflow being used
- `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done` or other)
**If any artifacts are not `done`:**
- Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- Prompt user for confirmation to continue
- Proceed if user confirms
3. **Check task completion status**
Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
**If incomplete tasks found:**
- Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- Prompt user for confirmation to continue
- Proceed if user confirms
**If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
Check for delta specs at `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`. If none exist, proceed without sync prompt.
**If delta specs exist:**
- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
- Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
- Show a combined summary before prompting
**Prompt options:**
- If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
- If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
If user chooses sync, use Task tool (subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Use Skill tool to invoke openspec-sync-specs for change '<name>'. Delta spec analysis: <include the analyzed delta spec summary>"). Proceed to archive regardless of choice.
5. **Perform the archive**
Create the archive directory if it doesn't exist:
```bash
mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive
```
Generate target name using current date: `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`
**Check if target already exists:**
- If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
- If no: Move the change directory to archive
```bash
mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
```
6. **Display summary**
Show archive completion summary including:
- Change name
- Schema that was used
- Archive location
- Spec sync status (synced / sync skipped / no delta specs)
- Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
**Output On Success**
```
## Archive Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs
All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
```
**Output On Success (No Delta Specs)**
```
## Archive Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** No delta specs
All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
```
**Output On Success With Warnings**
```
## Archive Complete (with warnings)
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** Sync skipped (user chose to skip)
**Warnings:**
- Archived with 2 incomplete artifacts
- Archived with 3 incomplete tasks
- Delta spec sync was skipped (user chose to skip)
Review the archive if this was not intentional.
```
**Output On Error (Archive Exists)**
```
## Archive Failed
**Change:** <change-name>
**Target:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
Target archive directory already exists.
**Options:**
1. Rename the existing archive
2. Delete the existing archive if it's a duplicate
3. Wait until a different date to archive
```
**Guardrails**
- Always prompt for change selection if not provided
- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
- Show clear summary of what happened
- If sync is requested, use the Skill tool to invoke `openspec-sync-specs` (agent-driven)
- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
---
name: "OPSX: Explore"
description: "Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements"
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, explore, experimental, thinking]
---
Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
**Input**: The argument after `/opsx:explore` is whatever the user wants to think about. Could be:
- A vague idea: "real-time collaboration"
- A specific problem: "the auth system is getting unwieldy"
- A change name: "add-dark-mode" (to explore in context of that change)
- A comparison: "postgres vs sqlite for this"
- Nothing (just enter explore mode)
---
## The Stance
- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
---
## What You Might Do
Depending on what the user brings, you might:
**Explore the problem space**
- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
- Challenge assumptions
- Reframe the problem
- Find analogies
**Investigate the codebase**
- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
- Find integration points
- Identify patterns already in use
- Surface hidden complexity
**Compare options**
- Brainstorm multiple approaches
- Build comparison tables
- Sketch tradeoffs
- Recommend a path (if asked)
**Visualize**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Use ASCII diagrams liberally │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ State │────────▶│ State │ │
│ │ A │ │ B │ │
│ └────────┘ └────────┘ │
│ │
│ System diagrams, state machines, │
│ data flows, architecture sketches, │
│ dependency graphs, comparison tables │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Surface risks and unknowns**
- Identify what could go wrong
- Find gaps in understanding
- Suggest spikes or investigations
---
## OpenSpec Awareness
You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
### Check for context
At the start, quickly check what exists:
```bash
openspec list --json
```
This tells you:
- If there are active changes
- Their names, schemas, and status
- What the user might be working on
If the user mentioned a specific change name, read its artifacts for context.
### When no change exists
Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
### When a change exists
If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
1. **Read existing artifacts for context**
- `openspec/changes/<name>/proposal.md`
- `openspec/changes/<name>/design.md`
- `openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md`
- etc.
2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
- "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
- "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
| Insight Type | Where to Capture |
|--------------|------------------|
| New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
| Requirement changed | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
| Design decision made | `design.md` |
| Scope changed | `proposal.md` |
| New work identified | `tasks.md` |
| Assumption invalidated | Relevant artifact |
Example offers:
- "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
- "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
- "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
---
## What You Don't Have To Do
- Follow a script
- Ask the same questions every time
- Produce a specific artifact
- Reach a conclusion
- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
- Be brief (this is thinking time)
---
## Ending Discovery
There's no required ending. Discovery might:
- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
When things crystallize, you might offer a summary - but it's optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
---
## Guardrails
- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
---
name: "OPSX: Propose"
description: Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step
category: Workflow
tags: [workflow, artifacts, experimental]
---
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
I'll create a change with artifacts:
- proposal.md (what & why)
- design.md (how)
- tasks.md (implementation steps)
When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply
---
**Input**: The argument after `/opsx:propose` is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
**Steps**
1. **If no input provided, ask what they want to build**
Use the **AskUserQuestion tool** (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
> "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
2. **Create the change directory**
```bash
openspec new change "<name>"
```
This creates a scaffolded change at `openspec/changes/<name>/` with `.openspec.yaml`.
3. **Get the artifact build order**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Parse the JSON to get:
- `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
- `artifacts`: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
4. **Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready**
Use the **TodoWrite tool** to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
- Get instructions:
```bash
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
```
- The instructions JSON includes:
- `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `template`: The structure to use for your output file
- `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
- `outputPath`: Where to write the artifact
- `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Create the artifact file using `template` as the structure
- Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
- Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
b. **Continue until all `applyRequires` artifacts are complete**
- After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
- Check if every artifact ID in `applyRequires` has `status: "done"` in the artifacts array
- Stop when all `applyRequires` artifacts are done
c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
- Use **AskUserQuestion tool** to clarify
- Then continue with creation
5. **Show final status**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>"
```
**Output**
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
- What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
- Prompt: "Run `/opsx:apply` to start implementing."
**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type
- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
- Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
- These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
**Guardrails**
- Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's `apply.requires`)
- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
---
name: continue
description: Capture a full project status snapshot so the next session can continue seamlessly from where this one left off. Use when the user is ending a session and wants to preserve context for resumption.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires git. OpenSpec CLI optional (gracefully skipped if unavailable).
metadata:
author: sentryagent
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Capture the full current project status and store it in persistent memory so the next session can pick up exactly where this one left off — no context lost, no recap needed.
**Input**: No arguments required. Invoke at any point when ending a session.
**Steps**
1. **Capture git state**
Run the following in parallel:
```bash
git status
git branch --show-current
git log --oneline -10
git diff --stat HEAD
git stash list
```
Record:
- Current branch name
- Uncommitted files (staged and unstaged), with change type (M/A/D/?)
- Last 10 commit messages (for continuity context)
- Summary of diff stats if uncommitted changes exist
- Any stashed work
2. **Capture OpenSpec change state**
Run `openspec list --json` to get all active changes.
For each active (non-archived) change, run:
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
For each active change, also read its `tasks.md` to count:
- Total tasks
- Completed tasks (`- [x]`)
- Pending tasks (`- [ ]`)
- The text of the next pending task (to know what's up next)
Record per change:
- Change name
- Schema
- Artifact completion (which are done, which are pending)
- Task progress (X of Y complete)
- Next pending task description
- Any delta specs present (`openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`)
**If `openspec` CLI is unavailable or fails:** Note it and skip this section gracefully.
**If no active changes:** Note that there are no active OpenSpec changes.
3. **Capture in-session conversation context**
Summarize what was worked on in this session based on the conversation:
- What was the user trying to accomplish?
- What was completed?
- What was left in-progress or blocked?
- Any key decisions made during this session
- Any open questions or next actions the user mentioned
Keep this factual and brief — 38 bullet points.
4. **Capture memory file state**
Read `MEMORY.md` from the project memory directory:
`~/.claude/projects/-home-ubuntu-vj-ai-agents-dev-sentryagent-idp/memory/MEMORY.md`
Note the existing memory entries to avoid duplication in the next step.
5. **Write session snapshot to memory**
Write a `session_snapshot.md` file to the project memory directory:
`~/.claude/projects/-home-ubuntu-vj-ai-agents-dev-sentryagent-idp/memory/session_snapshot.md`
Use this structure:
```markdown
---
name: Session Snapshot
description: Last session status — git state, OpenSpec progress, and conversation context for seamless resumption
type: project
---
**Session ended:** YYYY-MM-DD (today's date)
## Git State
**Branch:** <branch-name>
**Uncommitted changes:** <count> files (<list filenames>)
**Last commit:** <hash> <message>
<If uncommitted changes exist, list them with their status>
<If stashes exist, list them>
## OpenSpec Changes
<For each active change:>
### <change-name>
- **Schema:** <schema-name>
- **Artifacts:** <done-count>/<total-count> complete (<list incomplete artifact names>)
- **Tasks:** <done-count>/<total-count> complete
- **Next task:** <text of next pending task>
- **Delta specs:** <present / none>
<If no active changes:> No active OpenSpec changes.
## Session Work
<Bullet list of what was worked on, completed, and left in-progress>
## Next Actions
<Bullet list of concrete next steps to resume — derived from pending tasks, blockers, open questions>
```
**IMPORTANT:** Always overwrite `session_snapshot.md` — this is a rolling snapshot, not a log. Only the most recent session state matters.
6. **Update MEMORY.md index**
Read the current `MEMORY.md`. If `session_snapshot.md` is not already listed, add it:
```
- [Session Snapshot](session_snapshot.md) — Last session: YYYY-MM-DD | branch: <name> | <N> active changes | <N> uncommitted files
```
If it is already listed, update the line to reflect today's date and current state.
Write the updated `MEMORY.md`.
7. **Display break summary**
Show a clean summary so the user knows the snapshot is complete:
```
## Snapshot Saved — See You Next Session
**Branch:** <branch-name>
**Uncommitted files:** <count> (<filenames>)
**Active changes:** <count>
<For each active change:>
- <change-name>: <done>/<total> tasks complete — Next: "<next task text>"
**Session context saved to memory.**
To resume: start a new session and run /continue — Claude will load the snapshot and pick up where you left off.
```
**Output On Success**
```
## Snapshot Saved — See You Next Session
**Branch:** develop
**Uncommitted files:** 3 (src/auth/token.ts, tests/auth.test.ts, README.md)
**Active changes:** 1
- add-agent-auth: 4/7 tasks complete — Next: "Implement JWT signing with RS256"
**Session context saved to memory.**
To resume: start a new session and run /continue — Claude will load the snapshot and pick up where you left off.
```
**Guardrails**
- Always overwrite `session_snapshot.md` — do NOT append or create versioned copies
- Never include secrets, tokens, or credentials in the snapshot
- If `openspec list` fails (CLI not available), note that and skip OpenSpec capture gracefully
- If git is unavailable, note that and skip git capture gracefully
- Keep the session context summary factual — no speculation beyond what the user explicitly stated
- The MEMORY.md index line for `session_snapshot.md` must stay under 150 characters
- This skill does NOT commit code, push branches, or modify any project files — it only writes to the memory directory
- Session date must use the actual current date (not a placeholder)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
---
name: openspec-apply-change
description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
author: openspec
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
**Steps**
1. **Select the change**
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/opsx:apply <other>`).
2. **Check status to understand the schema**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Parse the JSON to understand:
- `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
3. **Get apply instructions**
```bash
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
```
This returns:
- Context file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
**Handle states:**
- If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change
- If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive
- Otherwise: proceed to implementation
4. **Read context files**
Read the files listed in `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output.
The files depend on the schema being used:
- **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
5. **Show current progress**
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)**
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]`
- Continue to next task
**Pause if:**
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
7. **On completion or pause, show status**
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
**Output During Implementation**
```
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
```
**Output On Completion**
```
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
```
**Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)**
```
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
```
**Guardrails**
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
**Fluid Workflow Integration**
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
---
name: openspec-archive-change
description: Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
author: openspec
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
**Steps**
1. **If no change name provided, prompt for selection**
Run `openspec list --json` to get available changes. Use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to let the user select.
Show only active changes (not already archived).
Include the schema used for each change if available.
**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
2. **Check artifact completion status**
Run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to check artifact completion.
Parse the JSON to understand:
- `schemaName`: The workflow being used
- `artifacts`: List of artifacts with their status (`done` or other)
**If any artifacts are not `done`:**
- Display warning listing incomplete artifacts
- Use **AskUserQuestion tool** to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
3. **Check task completion status**
Read the tasks file (typically `tasks.md`) to check for incomplete tasks.
Count tasks marked with `- [ ]` (incomplete) vs `- [x]` (complete).
**If incomplete tasks found:**
- Display warning showing count of incomplete tasks
- Use **AskUserQuestion tool** to confirm user wants to proceed
- Proceed if user confirms
**If no tasks file exists:** Proceed without task-related warning.
4. **Assess delta spec sync state**
Check for delta specs at `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/`. If none exist, proceed without sync prompt.
**If delta specs exist:**
- Compare each delta spec with its corresponding main spec at `openspec/specs/<capability>/spec.md`
- Determine what changes would be applied (adds, modifications, removals, renames)
- Show a combined summary before prompting
**Prompt options:**
- If changes needed: "Sync now (recommended)", "Archive without syncing"
- If already synced: "Archive now", "Sync anyway", "Cancel"
If user chooses sync, use Task tool (subagent_type: "general-purpose", prompt: "Use Skill tool to invoke openspec-sync-specs for change '<name>'. Delta spec analysis: <include the analyzed delta spec summary>"). Proceed to archive regardless of choice.
5. **Perform the archive**
Create the archive directory if it doesn't exist:
```bash
mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive
```
Generate target name using current date: `YYYY-MM-DD-<change-name>`
**Check if target already exists:**
- If yes: Fail with error, suggest renaming existing archive or using different date
- If no: Move the change directory to archive
```bash
mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
```
6. **Display summary**
Show archive completion summary including:
- Change name
- Schema that was used
- Archive location
- Whether specs were synced (if applicable)
- Note about any warnings (incomplete artifacts/tasks)
**Output On Success**
```
## Archive Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Archived to:** openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/
**Specs:** ✓ Synced to main specs (or "No delta specs" or "Sync skipped")
All artifacts complete. All tasks complete.
```
**Guardrails**
- Always prompt for change selection if not provided
- Use artifact graph (openspec status --json) for completion checking
- Don't block archive on warnings - just inform and confirm
- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive (it moves with the directory)
- Show clear summary of what happened
- If sync is requested, use openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven)
- If delta specs exist, always run the sync assessment and show the combined summary before prompting

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
---
name: openspec-explore
description: Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
author: openspec
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Enter explore mode. Think deeply. Visualize freely. Follow the conversation wherever it goes.
**IMPORTANT: Explore mode is for thinking, not implementing.** You may read files, search code, and investigate the codebase, but you must NEVER write code or implement features. If the user asks you to implement something, remind them to exit explore mode first and create a change proposal. You MAY create OpenSpec artifacts (proposals, designs, specs) if the user asks—that's capturing thinking, not implementing.
**This is a stance, not a workflow.** There are no fixed steps, no required sequence, no mandatory outputs. You're a thinking partner helping the user explore.
---
## The Stance
- **Curious, not prescriptive** - Ask questions that emerge naturally, don't follow a script
- **Open threads, not interrogations** - Surface multiple interesting directions and let the user follow what resonates. Don't funnel them through a single path of questions.
- **Visual** - Use ASCII diagrams liberally when they'd help clarify thinking
- **Adaptive** - Follow interesting threads, pivot when new information emerges
- **Patient** - Don't rush to conclusions, let the shape of the problem emerge
- **Grounded** - Explore the actual codebase when relevant, don't just theorize
---
## What You Might Do
Depending on what the user brings, you might:
**Explore the problem space**
- Ask clarifying questions that emerge from what they said
- Challenge assumptions
- Reframe the problem
- Find analogies
**Investigate the codebase**
- Map existing architecture relevant to the discussion
- Find integration points
- Identify patterns already in use
- Surface hidden complexity
**Compare options**
- Brainstorm multiple approaches
- Build comparison tables
- Sketch tradeoffs
- Recommend a path (if asked)
**Visualize**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Use ASCII diagrams liberally │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ State │────────▶│ State │ │
│ │ A │ │ B │ │
│ └────────┘ └────────┘ │
│ │
│ System diagrams, state machines, │
│ data flows, architecture sketches, │
│ dependency graphs, comparison tables │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Surface risks and unknowns**
- Identify what could go wrong
- Find gaps in understanding
- Suggest spikes or investigations
---
## OpenSpec Awareness
You have full context of the OpenSpec system. Use it naturally, don't force it.
### Check for context
At the start, quickly check what exists:
```bash
openspec list --json
```
This tells you:
- If there are active changes
- Their names, schemas, and status
- What the user might be working on
### When no change exists
Think freely. When insights crystallize, you might offer:
- "This feels solid enough to start a change. Want me to create a proposal?"
- Or keep exploring - no pressure to formalize
### When a change exists
If the user mentions a change or you detect one is relevant:
1. **Read existing artifacts for context**
- `openspec/changes/<name>/proposal.md`
- `openspec/changes/<name>/design.md`
- `openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md`
- etc.
2. **Reference them naturally in conversation**
- "Your design mentions using Redis, but we just realized SQLite fits better..."
- "The proposal scopes this to premium users, but we're now thinking everyone..."
3. **Offer to capture when decisions are made**
| Insight Type | Where to Capture |
|--------------|------------------|
| New requirement discovered | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
| Requirement changed | `specs/<capability>/spec.md` |
| Design decision made | `design.md` |
| Scope changed | `proposal.md` |
| New work identified | `tasks.md` |
| Assumption invalidated | Relevant artifact |
Example offers:
- "That's a design decision. Capture it in design.md?"
- "This is a new requirement. Add it to specs?"
- "This changes scope. Update the proposal?"
4. **The user decides** - Offer and move on. Don't pressure. Don't auto-capture.
---
## What You Don't Have To Do
- Follow a script
- Ask the same questions every time
- Produce a specific artifact
- Reach a conclusion
- Stay on topic if a tangent is valuable
- Be brief (this is thinking time)
---
## Handling Different Entry Points
**User brings a vague idea:**
```
User: I'm thinking about adding real-time collaboration
You: Real-time collab is a big space. Let me think about this...
COLLABORATION SPECTRUM
════════════════════════════════════════════
Awareness Coordination Sync
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐
│Presence│ │Cursors │ │ CRDT │
│ "3 │ │ Multi │ │Conflict│
│online" │ │ select │ │ free │
└────────┘ └────────┘ └────────┘
│ │ │
trivial moderate complex
Where's your head at?
```
**User brings a specific problem:**
```
User: The auth system is a mess
You: [reads codebase]
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CURRENT AUTH FLOW │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Google │ │ GitHub │ │ Email │
│ OAuth │ │ OAuth │ │ Magic │
└────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘
│ │ │
└─────────────┼─────────────┘
┌───────────┐
│ Session │
└─────┬─────┘
┌───────────┐
│ Perms │
└───────────┘
I see three tangles. Which one's burning?
```
**User is stuck mid-implementation:**
```
User: /opsx:explore add-auth-system
The OAuth integration is more complex than expected
You: [reads change artifacts]
You're on task 4: "Implement OAuth flow"
Let me trace what's involved...
[draws diagram, explores options, suggests paths]
Want to update the design to reflect this?
Or add a spike task to investigate?
```
**User wants to compare options:**
```
User: Should we use Postgres or SQLite?
You: Generic answer is boring. What's the context?
User: A CLI tool that tracks local dev environments
You: That changes everything.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLI TOOL DATA STORAGE │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key constraints:
• No daemon running
• Must work offline
• Single user
SQLite Postgres
Deployment embedded ✓ needs server ✗
Offline yes ✓ no ✗
Single file yes ✓ no ✗
SQLite. Not even close.
Unless... is there a sync component?
```
---
## Ending Discovery
There's no required ending. Discovery might:
- **Flow into a proposal**: "Ready to start? I can create a change proposal."
- **Result in artifact updates**: "Updated design.md with these decisions"
- **Just provide clarity**: User has what they need, moves on
- **Continue later**: "We can pick this up anytime"
When it feels like things are crystallizing, you might summarize:
```
## What We Figured Out
**The problem**: [crystallized understanding]
**The approach**: [if one emerged]
**Open questions**: [if any remain]
**Next steps** (if ready):
- Create a change proposal
- Keep exploring: just keep talking
```
But this summary is optional. Sometimes the thinking IS the value.
---
## Guardrails
- **Don't implement** - Never write code or implement features. Creating OpenSpec artifacts is fine, writing application code is not.
- **Don't fake understanding** - If something is unclear, dig deeper
- **Don't rush** - Discovery is thinking time, not task time
- **Don't force structure** - Let patterns emerge naturally
- **Don't auto-capture** - Offer to save insights, don't just do it
- **Do visualize** - A good diagram is worth many paragraphs
- **Do explore the codebase** - Ground discussions in reality
- **Do question assumptions** - Including the user's and your own

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
---
name: openspec-project-status
description: Show a human-readable summary of all OpenSpec changes — active, archived, artifact completion, and task progress. Use when the user wants to see the current state of the project's OpenSpec changes.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
author: sentryagent
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Show the full OpenSpec project status in a clear, human-readable format. No raw JSON — just a clean picture of where the project stands.
**Input**: No arguments required.
**Steps**
1. **Get all changes**
Run:
```bash
openspec list --json
```
Separate results into:
- **Active changes** (not in `archive/`)
- **Archived changes** (in `archive/`)
If the command fails or no changes exist, display a friendly empty state (see Output section).
2. **For each active change, gather full status**
Run in parallel for all active changes:
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Also read each change's `tasks.md` to extract:
- Total task count
- Completed tasks (`- [x]`)
- Pending tasks (`- [ ]`)
- Text of the **next pending task** (first `- [ ]` item)
Also check for delta specs at `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/` — note if present.
3. **For archived changes**
List them by archive date (newest first). No need to read full status — just show name and archive date from the folder name (`YYYY-MM-DD-<name>`).
4. **Render the human-readable status report**
Use the output format defined below.
**Output Format**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
### Active Changes (<count>)
────────────────────────────────────────
<change-name>
────────────────────────────────────────
Schema: <schema-name>
Phase: <inferred phase label>
Artifacts
✓ proposal done
✓ design done
◌ tasks pending
Tasks <done>/<total> complete
████████░░░░░░░░ 50%
Next: "<text of next pending task>"
Delta Specs <present / none>
────────────────────────────────────────
<Repeat for each active change>
---
### Archived Changes (<count>)
2026-03-20 add-initial-auth
2026-03-15 setup-ci-pipeline
---
### Summary
Active changes: <N>
Ready to apply: <N>
In progress: <N>
Complete: <N>
Archived: <N>
```
**Phase inference rules** (derive strictly from actual artifact + task state):
- `Proposing` — proposal artifact is not done
- `Designing` — proposal done, design not done
- `Speccing` — design done, tasks artifact not done
- `Ready to Implement` — all artifacts done, 0 tasks complete
- `In Progress` — all artifacts done, some tasks complete but not all
- `Complete` — all artifacts done, all tasks complete (not yet archived)
**Progress bar rules:**
- 16 chars wide: `` per completed segment, `` for remaining
- Show percentage after bar
- If 0 tasks: show `No tasks yet`
- If all tasks done: show `████████████████ 100% All done!`
**Artifact status icons:**
- `` — done
- `` — pending / not started
**Output: No active changes**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
### Active Changes (0)
No active changes. Start one with /opsx:propose
---
### Archived Changes (<count>)
...
### Summary
Active changes: 0
Archived: <N>
```
**Output: OpenSpec CLI unavailable**
```
## OpenSpec Project Status
OpenSpec CLI not available. Cannot read change data.
Make sure `openspec` is installed and accessible in your PATH.
```
**Guardrails**
- Never show raw JSON — always translate to human-readable output
- Never guess artifact or task state — always read from actual files and CLI output
- If `tasks.md` does not exist for a change, show `No tasks file` instead of 0/0
- Archived changes are display-only — never modify them
- Phase labels must be inferred strictly from actual artifact + task state, not assumed
- If `openspec status` fails for a specific change, show that change with `Status unavailable` and continue

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
---
name: openspec-propose
description: Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires openspec CLI.
metadata:
author: openspec
version: "1.0"
generatedBy: "1.2.0"
---
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
I'll create a change with artifacts:
- proposal.md (what & why)
- design.md (how)
- tasks.md (implementation steps)
When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply
---
**Input**: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
**Steps**
1. **If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build**
Use the **AskUserQuestion tool** (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
> "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → `add-user-auth`).
**IMPORTANT**: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
2. **Create the change directory**
```bash
openspec new change "<name>"
```
This creates a scaffolded change at `openspec/changes/<name>/` with `.openspec.yaml`.
3. **Get the artifact build order**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
```
Parse the JSON to get:
- `applyRequires`: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., `["tasks"]`)
- `artifacts`: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
4. **Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready**
Use the **TodoWrite tool** to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. **For each artifact that is `ready` (dependencies satisfied)**:
- Get instructions:
```bash
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
```
- The instructions JSON includes:
- `context`: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `rules`: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
- `template`: The structure to use for your output file
- `instruction`: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
- `outputPath`: Where to write the artifact
- `dependencies`: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Create the artifact file using `template` as the structure
- Apply `context` and `rules` as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
- Show brief progress: "Created <artifact-id>"
b. **Continue until all `applyRequires` artifacts are complete**
- After creating each artifact, re-run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`
- Check if every artifact ID in `applyRequires` has `status: "done"` in the artifacts array
- Stop when all `applyRequires` artifacts are done
c. **If an artifact requires user input** (unclear context):
- Use **AskUserQuestion tool** to clarify
- Then continue with creation
5. **Show final status**
```bash
openspec status --change "<name>"
```
**Output**
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
- What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
- Prompt: "Run `/opsx:apply` or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
**Artifact Creation Guidelines**
- Follow the `instruction` field from `openspec instructions` for each artifact type
- The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use `template` as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections
- **IMPORTANT**: `context` and `rules` are constraints for YOU, not content for the file
- Do NOT copy `<context>`, `<rules>`, `<project_context>` blocks into the artifact
- These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
**Guardrails**
- Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's `apply.requires`)
- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next