# OpenSpec Proposal — vv-architect-setup **Status:** Approved & Archived **Proposed:** 2026-04-07 **Approved by:** CEO --- ## Problem Statement The SentryAgent.ai multi-agent engineering system has no independent quality gate. The Virtual CTO directs the engineering team (Architect, Developer, QA), which means the same chain of command that builds the software also signs off on its correctness. This creates a conflict of interest — the team grades its own homework. Additionally, `VALIDATOR.md` existed in the repository but contained the wrong content: a copy of `scripts/start-validator.sh` (the shell script). If the validator had been launched, Claude would have received a bash script as its system prompt, producing a broken agent with no defined purpose or audit methodology. ## Proposed Solution Introduce a **V&V Architect (Lead Validator)** — a 4th independent Claude Code instance that runs outside the CTO's chain of command and reports directly to the CEO. **WS1 — Fix VALIDATOR.md** Rewrite `VALIDATOR.md` as the proper system prompt for the Lead Validator agent. Must define: identity, independence principle, startup protocol, 8-phase audit methodology, issue format, severity definitions, and communication protocol. **WS2 — Fix start-validator.sh** Update `scripts/start-validator.sh` to: - Build a validator-specific workspace (not inherit CEO session context) - Include a sanity check that aborts if VALIDATOR.md still contains shell script content - Auto-initialise the shared V&V audit ledger on first run **WS3 — Shared V&V Issue Ledger** Create `openspec/vv_audit/` as the shared filesystem ledger accessible by both the Validator and the CTO via absolute paths. Create `LEDGER.md` as the audit index. **WS4 — Central Hub Channel** Create `#vv-findings` channel on the central hub for real-time validator notifications to CEO and CTO. BLOCKER findings also escalate to `#vpe-cto-approvals`. **WS5 — CTO Peer-Review Protocol Update** Update `.cto-workspace/CLAUDE.md` to reference the correct ledger path, hub channel, and dispute/resolution process so the CTO knows how to respond to validator findings. ## CEO Approval Approved 2026-04-07 per CEO directive: "if possible — yes you have my approvals — as our technical and business consultant — please make the changes you need to make sure we have fully independent system to check we have fully implemented our PRD per OpenSpec protocols"