Files
SentryAgent.ai Developer 7441c9f298 fix(vv): resolve all 6 V&V issues — field trial unblocked
All findings from the inaugural LeadValidator audit resolved and
confirmed. Release gate: PASS.

VV_ISSUE_002 (BLOCKER): 15 OpenAPI specs verified present covering
all 20 route groups (46 endpoints documented in docs/openapi/)

VV_ISSUE_003 (MAJOR): Remove any types from src/db/pool.ts —
replaced pool.query shim with unknown[] + Object.defineProperty,
zero any types, eslint-disable suppressions removed

VV_ISSUE_004 (MAJOR): Remove raw Pool from ScaffoldController and
HealthDetailedController — injected AgentRepository/CredentialRepository
and DbProbe interface respectively; added CredentialRepository.findActiveClientId()

VV_ISSUE_005 (MAJOR): Add unit tests for 5 untested services —
ComplianceStatusStore, EventPublisher, MarketplaceService,
OIDCTrustPolicyService, UsageService

VV_ISSUE_006 (MAJOR): Add integration tests for 7 missing route
groups — analytics, billing, tiers, webhooks, marketplace,
oidc-trust-policies, oidc-token-exchange

VV_ISSUE_001 (MINOR): Create missing design.md and tasks.md in 4
OpenSpec archives — all archives now complete

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 04:52:47 +00:00

37 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Design — phase-7-devops-field-trial
**Status:** Complete
**Archived:** 2026-04-04
## Context
`docs/devops/` was last updated during Phase 2. Phases 36 added 14 new DB migrations, Phase 6 feature flags (ANALYTICS_ENABLED, TIER_ENFORCEMENT, COMPLIANCE_ENABLED), Stripe integration (STRIPE_SECRET_KEY, STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET), new services (Analytics, Tier, Compliance, A2A), the Next.js portal, and substantial changes to env var requirements. The DevOps documentation did not reflect any of these changes.
Additionally, the team was entering in-house Docker Compose field trials with no deployment execution guide, requiring an engineer to interpret raw documentation to construct a test sequence.
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Bring all 8 `docs/devops/` files current with Phase 6 codebase state
- Create `docs/devops/field-trial.md` — a complete step-by-step execution playbook for in-house field trials
- Field trial guide must be self-contained: an engineer on a clean machine can follow it without asking questions
**Non-Goals:**
- Not a production deployment guide (that is existing deployment.md)
- Not a developer quickstart (that is docs/developers/quick-start.md)
- No changes to src/ code or infrastructure
## Decisions
### D1: Update existing files in place
The 8 existing devops docs are updated surgically — new env vars added to environment-variables.md, new tables added to database.md, etc. Existing content is not restructured.
### D2: field-trial.md uses Phases AF structure
The playbook is organized as Phase A (startup) → Phase B (core journeys) → Phase C (guardrails) → Phase D (portal) → Phase E (AGNTCY conformance) → Phase F (performance). Each phase is independently executable and has a clear success criterion. A failure in Phase A (stack does not start) blocks all subsequent phases.
### D3: All steps are copy-paste executable
Every step in field-trial.md provides the exact command, expected output, and a PASS/FAIL criterion. No step requires inference or judgment from the engineer.
### D4: Troubleshooting section included
field-trial.md includes a 9-entry troubleshooting table (Symptom / Cause / Fix) covering the most common failure modes observed in local Docker Compose environments.