All findings from the inaugural LeadValidator audit resolved and confirmed. Release gate: PASS. VV_ISSUE_002 (BLOCKER): 15 OpenAPI specs verified present covering all 20 route groups (46 endpoints documented in docs/openapi/) VV_ISSUE_003 (MAJOR): Remove any types from src/db/pool.ts — replaced pool.query shim with unknown[] + Object.defineProperty, zero any types, eslint-disable suppressions removed VV_ISSUE_004 (MAJOR): Remove raw Pool from ScaffoldController and HealthDetailedController — injected AgentRepository/CredentialRepository and DbProbe interface respectively; added CredentialRepository.findActiveClientId() VV_ISSUE_005 (MAJOR): Add unit tests for 5 untested services — ComplianceStatusStore, EventPublisher, MarketplaceService, OIDCTrustPolicyService, UsageService VV_ISSUE_006 (MAJOR): Add integration tests for 7 missing route groups — analytics, billing, tiers, webhooks, marketplace, oidc-trust-policies, oidc-token-exchange VV_ISSUE_001 (MINOR): Create missing design.md and tasks.md in 4 OpenSpec archives — all archives now complete Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
60 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# VV_ISSUE_001 — Missing `tasks.md` in 4 archived OpenSpec changes
|
||
|
||
**Status:** RESOLVED
|
||
**Severity:** MINOR
|
||
**Category:** DOCS
|
||
**Logged by:** LeadValidator
|
||
**Date:** 2026-04-07
|
||
**Audit phase:** Phase A — OpenSpec Completeness Check
|
||
|
||
## Finding
|
||
|
||
Four archived OpenSpec changes are missing their `tasks.md` artifact. The standard archive
|
||
structure (confirmed by all other archives) requires: `proposal.md`, `design.md`, `tasks.md`,
|
||
and a `specs/` directory. These four archives were committed to git per CTO report (#74–#78)
|
||
and the work they describe appears to have been implemented, but the `tasks.md` tracking
|
||
artifact was never created or archived.
|
||
|
||
This means Phase A verification cannot be performed by task-by-task inspection for these
|
||
four changes. The implementation is presumed complete based on CTO sign-off and git commit
|
||
history, but the audit trail is incomplete.
|
||
|
||
## Evidence
|
||
|
||
Archives missing `tasks.md`:
|
||
|
||
| Archive | Contents present | Missing |
|
||
|---------|-----------------|---------|
|
||
| `openspec/changes/archive/2026-04-02-engineering-docs/` | `design.md`, `proposal.md`, `specs/` | `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `openspec/changes/archive/developer-docs-phase6-update/` | `proposal.md`, `specs/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `openspec/changes/archive/engineering-docs-phase6-update/` | `proposal.md`, `specs/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `openspec/changes/archive/phase-7-devops-field-trial/` | `proposal.md`, `specs/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
|
||
The `developer-docs-phase6-update`, `engineering-docs-phase6-update`, and
|
||
`phase-7-devops-field-trial` archives are also missing `design.md`.
|
||
|
||
## Required Action
|
||
|
||
For each of the four affected archives, create the missing artifact(s):
|
||
- A `tasks.md` listing all workstream tasks (retroactively marked `[x]` as complete)
|
||
- A `design.md` (where also missing) documenting the design decisions made
|
||
|
||
This is a documentation standards fix, not a code change.
|
||
|
||
## CTO Response
|
||
|
||
Confirmed. The missing artifacts were an oversight from the rapid Phase 6 documentation cycle. All 7 missing files have been created retroactively with accurate content derived from each archive's proposal.md and the CTO sign-off records in #vpe-cto-approvals.
|
||
|
||
## Resolution
|
||
|
||
**Files created:**
|
||
|
||
| Archive | Files Created |
|
||
|---------|---------------|
|
||
| `2026-04-02-engineering-docs/` | `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `developer-docs-phase6-update/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `engineering-docs-phase6-update/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
| `phase-7-devops-field-trial/` | `design.md`, `tasks.md` |
|
||
|
||
All `tasks.md` files list workstream tasks retroactively marked `[x]` as complete. All `design.md` files document context, goals/non-goals, and key design decisions as they were actually made. Content is accurate and consistent with the proposal.md and committed implementation in each archive.
|